|
Roger Stack's latest posting -
http://hent.blogspot.com/ - (Knowledge and Slowness in Learning)
throws into such a sharp focus the need for education to be able to
adapt better, faster, deeper because of the speed of changes in the
wider community:
Knowledge workers need to know how to use
tools and frameworks to do their jobs according to Charles
Jennings, Global Head of Learning at Reuters UK. Jennings
painted
a clear picture of the way workplaces have
changed over the last 20 years on day 2 of the Global Summit 2006
in Sydney:
* 70% of jobs created in the USA since
1998 have been for "knowledge workers"
* "knowledge worker"jobs now make up 41%
of all jobs in the USA (2005)
* only 20-30% of workplace performance is
knowledge/skills related (2005)
* people learn 80% of what they need to
know informally on-the-job
He cited Kelley's longitudinal study
showing how the amount of knowledge that we need to know in our own
minds to do our jobs has changed: 1986 - 75% ... 1997 - 15-20%
... 2006 - 8-10%
Jennings spoke of the need to shift from
training to learning; of the need to know less and learn more; of
the need for workers to have tools and frameworks to locate and
process what they need to know when they
need to know it.
However this reality also serves to remind
us to have a clear vision of what shouldn't change, of what is
perennial.
One of the dimensions of my own attempt to
model education includes the change-don't change dimension. The
balance has to be struck, and sometimes re-adjusted,
between the need for change and the need
to have clear on-going values. The headlong pursuit to keep up with
the latest technology, which is now almost a daily challenge,
can easily rob us of an appropriate
investment in what should be the still centre.
The summary versions of my model are to be
found here http://www.sunwalk.org.uk/_sgg/m7_1.htm
How do you think the need to change and
not-change should be balanced - in the curriculum, the processes,
the defining of roles for teacher, school and other
institutions?
| Comments () >> |
 |
| Write comment |
| You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet. |
|